Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Driverless Commute

A digest clocking the most important technical, legal and regulatory developments shaping the path to full autonomy

open menu close menu

Driverless Commute

  • Home
  • About Us
  • News on AVs
  • Global AV Index
  • Global Guide to AVs 2023
    • Executive summary
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • China
    • Germany
    • Hungary
    • Italy
    • Poland
    • South Korea
    • Turkey
    • United Kingdom
    • United States

The Driverless Commute: Apple stuns with Drive.AI acquisition; did Florida go too far in new AV bill?; Toyota throws in with Baidu’s Apollo project; and Waymo rolls out limited partnership with Lyft in Arizona

By Eric Tanenblatt and James Richardson
June 28, 2019
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Driverless Commute
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

1. Assumptions and expectations

Apple, the famously secretive consumer electronics giant, said this week it had acquired self-driving startup Drive.AI, whose human-robot interaction systems and deep-learning approach earned it an outsize reputation in the autonomous constellation.

The days of going-it-alone are behind us.

  • Like many struggling to reconcile real-world deployment challenges (it turns out, engineering self-driving cars is a lot harder than marketers promised) with stratospheric expectations, Drive.AI had come into hard times recently. According to reports, it filed paperwork ahead of the Apple announcement that it intended to dissolve and lay off its entire workforce.
  • Previously, the company had a variety of splashy pilots under its belt, including a recent test in Texas in which human contingency drivers had been removed from some vehicles.
  • On the heels of tie ups between Volkswagen and Argo AI and another between Honda and Cruise Automation, we asked back in March which of the big carmakers would buy Drive.AI. To be fair, we weren’t far off.

This week’s announcement stunned analysts, who had interpreted Apple’s silence on its autonomous driving initiative as a signal of retrenchment. Looking outside-in doesn’t always yield the best intelligence, it seems.

  • In an industry of snake oil salesman, Apple’s refusal to engage in chest-beating that’s typical of self-driving firms is a unique outlier. (The CEO of one company promised his vehicles would be fully self-driving by the end of the year. Four years ago. That same CEO now says they’ll go Level 5 this year.)
  • Don’t expect that posture to somehow shift with the acqui-hire of Drive.AI, whose assets, including a fleet of self-driving shuttles and IP for converting conventional cars into self-driving ones, and workforce, chiefly in engineering and product design, are being folded into Apple’s Project Titan.

The Driverless Commute is provided by Dentons’ global Autonomous Vehicles team. If you believe a colleague or associate would benefit from this service, please share this link so they may subscribe.

2. Too lax?

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed a new law earlier this month to allow fully autonomous vehicles to operate whether or not a human contingency driver was present in the vehicle.

The bill is the third of its type in the nation, but is uniquely permissive. Now academics and transportation expects are asking whether the framework is an ill-considered invitation to danger.

The new rules, which are slated to take effect in July, don’t require that autonomous driving systems be tested, inspected, or certified by state officials before deploying, but requires that commercial and private owners of autonomous vehicles have a minimum of $1 million for death, bodily injury or property damage coverage. (The website Jalopnik described the framework as a “potentially deadly autonomous car experiment.”)

At issue is the very loose language used to define an autonomous vehicle and its safe operation. The bill reads:

“The hardware and software that are collectively capable of performing the entire dynamic driving task of an autonomous vehicle on a sustained basis, regardless of whether it is limited to a specific operational design domain.”

As people trained to look for loopholes, the words “sustained basis” certainly caught our attention. How long is a sustained basis? Is it the more than 11,000 miles Waymo cars drove in California on average between so-called disengagements (that is, when a self-driving car becomes overwhelmed in some way and must surrender operation to a human), or is it closer to the 2.5 miles driven by Toyota’s cars? Or maybe the 1.2 miles managed by SAIC between disengagements qualifies as a “sustained basis” in Florida.

3. The Auto(nomous) Bahn

  • Humans are bad drivers and, often, jerks. Teaching an autonomous system to anticipate or somehow mitigate our bad behavior has proven a challenging task, but Cruise says it’s trained its fleet to safely maneuver double-parked cars on the narrow, inclining streets of San Francisco.
  • London has greenlighted a pair of open road self-driving test routes.
  • Waymo said this week it is making some of its self-driving vans available to Phoenix area Lyft riders.

Toyota is joining Baidu’s open source self-driving platform as trade tensions between China and US continue.

Click here to speak with our experts and attorneys across the world to learn more about any of the items contained in this week’s report.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Apple, Argo AI, Arizona, Baidu, California, China, Cruise, Cruise Automation, Drive.AI, Florida, Honda, London, Lyft, SAIC, San Francisco, Texas, Toyota, VW, Waymo
Eric Tanenblatt

About Eric Tanenblatt

Eric Tanenblatt is the Global Chair of Public Policy and Regulation of Dentons, the world's largest law firm. He also leads the firm's US Public Policy Practice, leveraging his three decades of experience at the very highest levels of the federal and state governments.

All posts Full bio

James Richardson

About James Richardson

James Richardson is a strategic communications counselor with 15 years’ experience advising presidential candidates, Global Fortune 500 executives, national nonprofits, and sovereign governments on strategic communications and reputation management. He helps lead Dentons’ 3D Global Affairs practice.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Driverless Commute

Driverless Commute – February 23

By Eric Tanenblatt and James Richardson
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Driverless Commute
  • Global Autonomous Vehicles Survey

Global Guide to Autonomous Vehicles 2022

By Eric Tanenblatt, Michael Malterer, Peter Stockburger, and Michael Ledgett
  • Autonomous Vehicles

Hawaii Establishes AV Pilot Program

By Eric Tanenblatt and William M. Kaneko

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

  • Announcements
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Driverless Commute
  • General
  • Global Autonomous Vehicles Survey
  • UAVs
Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site