Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Driverless Commute

A digest clocking the most important technical, legal and regulatory developments shaping the path to full autonomy

open menu close menu

Driverless Commute

  • Home
  • About Us
  • News on AVs
  • Global AV Index
  • Global Guide to AVs 2023
    • Executive summary
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • China
    • Germany
    • Hungary
    • Italy
    • Poland
    • South Korea
    • Turkey
    • United Kingdom
    • United States

The Driverless Commute: Urban planning nightmares with AV deployment; AV industry’s diversity and inclusion crisis; and how bogus satellite data could hack an AVs operation.

By Eric Tanenblatt and James Richardson
August 9, 2019
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Driverless Commute
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

1. When AVs are king

New York City

Cities were once highly compact, walkable places that blended residences and workplaces and where people commanded primacy. Then the car came along.

Now, the modern American city, sprawling and traffic-plagued, is an ecosystem in complete service to cars. But what if AV deployment invites an even deeper calcification of the cars-first mentality in city centers?

Just imagine sidewalk gates. That was the whacky idea floated by one unnamed “automotive industry official” in a recent New York Times article:

“In New York, the unwritten rule is plain: Cross the street whenever and wherever — just don’t get hit. It’s a practice that separates New Yorkers from tourists, who innocently wait at the corner for the walk symbol. But if pedestrians know they’ll never be run over, jaywalking could explode, grinding traffic to a halt.

“One solution, suggested by an automotive industry official, is gates at each corner, which would periodically open to allow pedestrians to cross.

“That prospect seems as likely as never-late subways. But it’s an example of the thinking by those who worry about planning for the future.”

Autonomous vehicles will deploy in the real world, where pedestrians jaywalk and motorists drive aggressively. Trying to engineer solutions—if you want to call it that—to change ingrained social structures is a fruitless endeavor. Self-driving cars need to be able to withstand the chaos of real-world roads, not tech-bros’ vision of utopia.

The Driverless Commute is provided by Dentons’ global Autonomous Vehicles team. If you believe a colleague or associate would benefit from this service, please share this link so they may subscribe.

2. Gender gaps and racial blind spots: how the AV industry’s lack of diversity is creating new problems for deployment

The AV enthusiasm and trust gap between men and women has surged to an almost a 20-point difference in the latest research by AAA.

A majority of Americans remain wary of self-driving cars, but skepticism of the technology among women is especially pronounced.

  • Seventy-nine percent of women are afraid to ride in an autonomous vehicle, while only 62 percent of men told pollsters the same.
  • Similarly, only 14 percent of women said they were comfortable with the notion of full autonomy, while 30 percent of men said they were.

Those results track with a 2016 AAA survey but stand in contrast to recent efforts by makers of self-driving cars, most notably Waymo, to demonstrate the technology’s reliability after a series of notable industry stumbles. So what explains the durability of women’s distrust?

New York University Professor Meredith Broussard, an expert on AI implementation bias, told Axios the lack of representation and consideration of women in the engineering of these cars could be driving their suspicion. (By our count, the only prominent AV firm led by a woman is Zoox, whose female CEO only ascended earlier this year.)

  • Broussard says that the men designing AVs, among other AI applications, are often blind to social disparities.
  • Consider: crash-test dummies are almost exclusively modeled after the average man. These dummies inform safety standards and systems. Which probably explains how women are 73 percent more likely to be seriously injured in a car crash.

The industry’s diversity and inclusion problem isn’t just a problem for women, but could also pose safety risks for people of color.

Researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology tested the accuracy of object detection systems (not unlike those used in driverless cars) in positively identifying pedestrians of varying skin color and found a uniformly poor success rate in spotting people of color compared to those with lighter skin tones.

  • The researchers posited that the technology wasn’t inherently capable of recognizing people of color.
  • Instead, it was the dataset that trained the system that was to blame: the computer was trained to recognize pedestrians using a data set of predominantly white objects, so it was better equipped to recognize these faces.

If the data on which artificial intelligence is trained skews towards the biases of its engineers (like white men), those biases will be reflected in the computer.

3. The Auto(nomous) Bahn

  • At a security conference this week in Las Vegas, researchers demonstrated how hacked satellite data could cause AVs to stop, change lanes or even drive off the road on command.
  • A team of researchers in China have engineered a self-driving e-bike. Watch it maneuver around objects in this closed-course demonstration. (The bike, we should note, drove without a rider, which we have to imagine would complicate safe operation.)
  • Apple has expanded the size of its AV fleet in California, according to the latest state disclosures. The news comes after the company’s recent acquisition of Drive.AI.
  • Boston-based Optimus Ride just launched a free autonomous shuttle service in New York’s Brooklyn Navy Yard.
Click here to speak with our experts and attorneys across the world to learn more about any of the items contained in this week’s report.
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
AAA, Apple, Axios, Boston, Brooklyn Navy Yard, California, China, Drive.AI, Georgia Institute of Technology, Las Vegas, New York, New York Times, New York University, Optimus Ride, Waymo, Zoox
Eric Tanenblatt

About Eric Tanenblatt

Eric Tanenblatt is the Global Chair of Public Policy and Regulation of Dentons, the world's largest law firm. He also leads the firm's US Public Policy Practice, leveraging his three decades of experience at the very highest levels of the federal and state governments.

All posts Full bio

James Richardson

About James Richardson

James Richardson is a strategic communications counselor with 15 years’ experience advising presidential candidates, Global Fortune 500 executives, national nonprofits, and sovereign governments on strategic communications and reputation management. He helps lead Dentons’ 3D Global Affairs practice.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Driverless Commute
  • General

This Week in AV News

By Eric Tanenblatt, Peter Stockburger, and Walker Boothe
  • Autonomous Vehicles

5 Ways Autonomous Vehicles Will Change Law That You Might Not Expect

By Eric Tanenblatt
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Driverless Commute

Japan Aims to Move to Fully Electric Transit by 2045

By Eric Tanenblatt

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

  • Announcements
  • Autonomous Vehicles
  • Driverless Commute
  • General
  • Global Autonomous Vehicles Survey
  • UAVs
Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site